PRESENTED BY PALAPPLE

ADVERTISE WITH US

Posted by iPhoto.org - Feb 26, 2009

Advertise here in this prominent space for only $100 per month, your advertisement will appear in all of the post pages available across this website.
Check out the link about for more advertisement options provided, get your message across!

Advertise with Us

SNAPSHOCK IS COMING TO TOWN

Posted by iPhoto.org On Feb 26, 2009

You better watch out,
You better bookmark,
You better ready your pics, cos I'm tell you why...

Snapshock is coming to town!!

Snapshock

THE BEST PLACE FOR DRY SEAFOOD

Posted by StarryGift On Mar 20, 2009

全香港其中一間最具規模的海味網上專門店。專營零售燕窩、鮑魚、海參、魚翅、花膠、元貝、冬蟲草,極具食療價值。此外亦提供各項中藥海味烹調方法,以導出各食品的固本培元及補生之效。

客戶服務熱線:3158 1276
傳真熱線:3158 1416
電郵查詢:info@starrygift.com

海味軒 | 香港燕窩海味網上專門店


Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Fraudom of speech








crystal_ball
Have you checked
the Alamo’s basement?

In Scottsbluff, Nebraska, there’s a local ordinance forbidding fortune telling. However, the ACLU has sent a letter to the mayor letting him know they think the law is unconstitutional.


Interesting. I’m of several minds on this one.


1) I’m a big fan of the ACLU. Despite the sometimes slack-brained protestations of the far-right fear-mongers, the ACLU is a non-partisan defender of the Constitution, that pesky document that the President and all members of Congress swear to uphold. In an ideal world, we wouldn’t need the ACLU, but we live in a far from ideal world.


2) The ordinance in Nebraska may have religious roots; the Bible is clear about fortune telling (despite a large chunk of the Bible being devoted to prophecies and divination).


3) If the ordinance is religiously-based, then the ACLU may have a point. If they want to couch it as a freedom of speech issue, they again may have a point. However…


4) My thinking is that fortune telling, clairvoyance, and divination should be treated as any other marketable ability. Anyone advertising such abilities needs to be able to back up their claims. If they can’t, then it’s not really so much a free speech issue as it is one of fraud, or at least false or misleading advertising. And since we know after countless tests that they don’t work, there’s not much of a chance this will be a free speech issue.


5) I know that some loathsome people who claim to speak to the dead hide behind weasel words, saying this is for "entertainment purposes only", but I have also heard them say what they do is real despite that.


So, how to handle this?


I’ve always thought that there should be some aspect of the FTC that investigates paranormal purveyors of any stripe. They can be tested — now, who would do that I wonder — and if they come up short, they pay a hefty fine, enough to make them think twice about bilking the public. I do very much support the idea of caveat emptor, but we also need laws against defrauding people.


People in this country spend billions of dollars on such nonsense, and I bet a lot of ‘em complain about their taxes being too high. There are no winners here… but I would dearly love to see a big take-down of such things like this. The fines raised alone would probably fund the JREF for a century.


Tip o’ the crystal ball to Jack Dunn.


Picture from benleto’s Flickr Photostream, used under creative commons license.





Full story at http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadAstronomyBlog/~3/2ihzVNNHMiQ/

No comments:

Post a Comment



iPhoto.org facebook group
Advertise with Us